0 comment Sunday, May 18, 2014 | admin

This summer, Ms. Guyton reportedly began using this bank-owned beach house, valued at $12 million, as her own. Neighbors claim she threw numerous and lavish parties; at one of these grand galas, a yacht was anchored off shore and a smaller boat ferried guests to and fro.
Here's the story from an ABC affiliate:

Not surprisingly, Ms. Guyton did not answer reporters' calls at her office.
Wells Fargo, however, came out boldly with an ambiguously-worded statement:

"Wells Fargo & Company said today that its internal policies, including those that govern team member conduct, prohibit personal use of properties held by Wells Fargo. Based on these operating principles, the company has launched a full internal investigation of allegations that a team member was improperly using a bank-owned residential property in Malibu, California."Indeed, reports the LA Times, Wells says it will,
"take decisive action with respect to any team member who may have violated Wells Fargo�s policies. The allegations certainly do not reflect the conduct we expect of our team members. We place the highest value on honesty, trust and integrity to guide our team members in making business decisions each day. We regret the disruption to the neighboring property owners since these allegations were made."Blah, blah, blah. Blather, blather, blather. This begs several questions, the biggest being, why hasn't the bank denied all knowledge of Ms. Guyton's supposedly illicit self-dealing?
And if Wells Fargo didn't know she was using the house, if it didn't know about these posh parties, complete with yacht, why not? It certainly knew there were offers to buy the house -- offers that, according to the listing agent, Wells Fargo "repeatedly rebuffed."


9/13/09 correction (thanks to commenter Gretchen): This post has been updated to reflect Ms. Guyton's house is not in Marin County. And, as Gretchen points out, Fairfax is indeed a middle-class neighborhood.
Labels: Beach House, Cheronda Guyton, Wells Fargo